Describe Books In Pursuance Of Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
| Original Title: | Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March |
| ISBN: | 006108686X (ISBN13: 9780061086861) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | International Napoleonic Society Literary Award (2004) |
Adam Zamoyski
Paperback | Pages: 704 pages Rating: 4.3 | 1713 Users | 128 Reviews
Identify Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
| Title | : | Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March |
| Author | : | Adam Zamoyski |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 704 pages |
| Published | : | August 9th 2005 by Harper Perennial (first published August 3rd 2004) |
| Categories | : | History. Nonfiction. Cultural. Russia. Military. Military History. War. Military Fiction. France |
Commentary Concering Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
Napoleon dominated nearly all of Europe by 1810, largely succeeding in his aim to reign over the civilized world. But Britain eluded him. To conquer the island nation, he needed Russia's Tsar Alexander's help. The Tsar refused, and Napoleon vowed to teach him a lesson by intimidation and force. The ensuing invasion of Russia, during the frigid winter of 1812, would mark the beginning of the end of Napoleon's empire. Although his army captured Moscow after a brutal march deep into hostile territory, it was a hollow victory for the demoralized troops. Napoleon's men were eventually turned back, and their defeat was a momentous turning point in world affairs. Dramatic, insightful, and enormously absorbing, Moscow 1812 is a masterful work of history.Rating Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
Ratings: 4.3 From 1713 Users | 128 ReviewsCriticize Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
I've come to accept that in order to read any history that involves the Russian people I'm going to have to be prepared for a high level of revulsion at the sheer amount of human suffering it takes for that people to make even the slightest step forward or back. This book is so well written that it will horrify you. As events escelate the the Grande Armee finds itself shorter on food, without horses, and colder by the day, their suffering becomes almost unbearable to read about. "The SecondNapoleon threw men around like toy soldiers and reading this remarkably compelling book youre left thinking what it was all about, so much waste and suffering. At the time he was considered a monster by many and a hero by many others, the world spirit even, and I think it was only because he burst onto the old European scene of Royal dictatorships and shook the whole medieval edifice finally loose and became a hero to the likes of the Romantic poets and Beethoven (for a while) that he was
This book is like a train wreck. It's horrific but you can't look away. Napoleon's march to Russia was bleak, the battles poorly planned, the weather unbearable and the results all too true and verifiable. Brilliantly written.
DNF on page 295. I'm going to be completely honest here: I bought this book approximately a million years ago solely because of the 1812 Overture. Yeah. I knew nothing about Napoleon's march on Moscow, but I knew and loved the 1812 Overture, so I figured I may as well learn the story behind it. And going into a reread probably 8 years after I bought it, all I remembered was one disturbingly descriptive scene of how French soldiers ended up slicing bits off the officer's horses as they were
A work about of Napoleon's vast objective, the invasion of Russia. The author tell us about disaster campaign and the horrible events described for the soldiers. Zamoyski also analysed the political run up to the campaign, maybe not enough detail on battle strategy. Well described and researched, the author also made an excellent use of the first hand accounts of the soldiers and witness the suffering like cannibalism; the best part of the book is about of the retreat, well described for example
Zamoyski's books are always a literary and historical treat. Moscow 1812 is no exception. This is a brutal endurance-test as well as a necessary revision of certain historical presumptions, especially for the Anglophone world. Zamoyski pours cold water on the notion that Kutusov was a great general, one of the initial claims I found surprising. The narrative argues the point fairly persuasively. Zamoyski proves an absolutely expert at showing just how hubristic Napoleon was, and how his invasion
I quite liked his writing style. The chapters describing the withdraw of the Grande Armee were quite graphic however, far more brutal then anything ive read about it so far. Of course I had seen the book quite a few times but I only picked it up once I heard a nice interview with Zamoyski on the Napoleon Podcast. Glad I read the book and Ill for certain try to read some more about the battles along the Berezina and some personal memoires about the campaign. The authors view on Napoleon himself
0 Comments